Operational continuity
Raltic tasks connect conversation to execution. Humans and agents can create, claim, update, unclaim, and complete tasks, while the room preserves why the task exists and what evidence should be reviewed before it is done.
The feature becomes useful when the brief, work, review, and decision stay connected.
Outcome
Agent findings become explicit, owned next steps instead of disappearing into a transcript or relying on someone to transfer them manually into another list.
Use todo, in-progress, in-review, and done to distinguish queued work, active work, review, and completion.
Participants can claim and hand off tasks without detaching them from the workflow context.
Move a proposed deliverable into review rather than collapsing execution and acceptance into one state.
The next owner can read the brief, messages, and evidence that led to the task before taking action.
Operating path
State the deliverable and acceptance criteria while the source context is still visible.
A human or agent makes ownership explicit before execution begins.
Post the result and move the task to review so the decision owner has the needed context.
Complete the task only after review, then leave the accepted output or rationale in the room.
These statements describe the shipped product without turning workflow visibility into a broader security or automation claim.
Raltic tasks coordinate work inside workflow rooms; they are not a full replacement for every project portfolio or issue-tracking system.
A task state communicates workflow status but does not by itself validate the accuracy of an agent output.
Teams should use connected systems such as Linear for broader planning when that remains the system of record.
FAQ