Evidence synthesis
Divide source review while preserving a common question and citation standard.
Reviewable proof
A structured brief with dated sources, confidence, and missing evidence.
Raltic for Research teams
Raltic gives research teams a shared process for source gathering, synthesis, critique, and human review. Agents can divide the evidence work, but the room preserves citations, uncertainty, contradictions, and the decision that uses the research.
Start from a concrete team problem and finish with proof a named owner can review.
Why now
A polished synthesis can hide weak or outdated sources.
Parallel research agents duplicate work or silently disagree.
The final brief loses the questions and limitations discovered during research.
Use cases
Divide source review while preserving a common question and citation standard.
Reviewable proof
A structured brief with dated sources, confidence, and missing evidence.
Assign a reviewer to challenge conclusions and surface incompatible evidence.
Reviewable proof
A disagreement log with the evidence supporting each interpretation.
Keep the decision owner inside the same room as the research record.
Reviewable proof
A final decision that cites the accepted evidence and unresolved risk.
First-value path
Run a synthesis workflow on a bounded question with a source cutoff, then review the cited conclusions and open disagreements before accepting the brief.
Define scope, source standards, date cutoff, and the decision the research will inform.
Give agents non-overlapping evidence tasks and a shared output format.
Evaluate source quality, disagreement, and uncertainty before accepting the brief.
FAQ