Research-backed, source-linked guidance for teams designing AI agent workflows that people can inspect, review, and improve.
Buying research
Transparent shortlists for orchestration, visual building, observability, human review, and team workflow software. Each guide states the method, sources, tradeoffs, and Raltic's conflict of interest.
Latest research
Human-in-the-loop is not a generic checkbox. The reviewer needs authority, evidence, time, and a clearly defined point where an agent proposal becomes an accepted decision.
Read articleAgent orchestration is the coordination layer that turns separate models and tools into an accountable workflow with clear roles, handoffs, controls, and a human-owned outcome.
Read articleThe right runtime depends on where the required tools and data live. Local agents fit machine-bound work; cloud agents reduce setup and improve availability for workflows that can use managed context and connectors.
Read articleAn approval workflow should control a meaningful transition. It must state what the agent may prepare, what remains unapproved, who can decide, and which external system ultimately enforces the action.
Read articleAgent observability connects execution telemetry to the workflow record. Teams need enough evidence to diagnose failures and review outcomes without pretending they can inspect hidden model reasoning.
Read articleMulti-agent systems are useful when roles are genuinely distinct. These seven patterns keep task ownership, context transfer, evidence, and review visible instead of simulating an organization chart.
Read articleThe best product workflows delegate evidence preparation while preserving customer judgment, prioritization, and launch decisions for the team.
Read articleA polished agent demo usually shows the happy path and hides the expensive parts: context assembly, permissions, failed tools, reviewer effort, and recovery. Test the operating model before you compare feature lists.
Read articleTeams often ask whether to build or buy before agreeing on what they need. A runtime, an automation graph, a reviewer interface, and a shared team record are separate layers with different ownership costs.
Read articleMost agent-platform comparisons fail before the feature table begins. They place a developer SDK, a visual builder, a cloud runtime, a trace viewer, and a team workspace in one category even though each owns a different part of the work.
Read articleA single quality score hides the failure you need to fix. A useful scorecard separates the final outcome from the path, evidence, tools, risk, and reviewer effort, then runs the same cases again after every change.
Read articleThe first canvas demo usually works. The useful evaluation starts when a source is missing, a credential expires, the reviewer says no, and a new operator has to understand the workflow six months later.
Read article