Visible execution state
Raltic keeps agent run state and posted outputs attached to the workflow room. Reviewers can see which agent participated, what evidence it surfaced, which tasks remain open, and whether the work is still running, waiting, or ready for human review.
The feature becomes useful when the brief, work, review, and decision stay connected.
Outcome
Teams can diagnose a weak or incomplete result from the workflow record instead of treating every agent response as an opaque one-shot answer.
Execution status appears beside the room where the work was requested, reducing the gap between monitoring and decision-making.
Posted updates show which participant contributed the finding or artifact.
Open and in-review tasks expose remaining work even after an individual agent run has stopped.
The room retains posted proof and the final decision for future investigation, onboarding, and repeated runs.
Operating path
State what evidence, artifact, or conclusion the run must produce before starting.
Use participant, run, and task signals to distinguish active work from waiting or review-ready work.
Review the actual posted findings and artifacts, not only a completion signal.
Record approval, rejection, or the next task so later readers can interpret the run correctly.
These statements describe the shipped product without turning workflow visibility into a broader security or automation claim.
Raltic records what runtimes post to the workflow; it does not claim to capture every hidden model reasoning step.
A successful run status does not prove that the output is correct or approved.
Operational observability should be combined with task-specific evaluation criteria for higher-risk workflows.
FAQ