Explicit decision ownership
Raltic makes the point of review visible inside the workflow room. Agents can draft, investigate, and propose; a person evaluates the evidence, requests changes, and records the decision before the team treats the output as approved.
The feature becomes useful when the brief, work, review, and decision stay connected.
Outcome
Teams can distinguish an agent proposal from an accepted decision and see who still needs to review the work.
Move work into an in-review task state so the room clearly separates active agent work from a human decision.
Keep supporting messages, artifacts, source links, and run status close to the output that needs review.
Ask an agent to revise without opening a new private session or dropping the rationale that prompted the change.
Leave the accepted outcome and its reasoning in the room so future teammates and agents can reuse it.
Operating path
Name the person or role responsible for accepting the output before the agent begins.
Put evidence requirements, constraints, and prohibited actions into the brief.
Use the task state and room context to signal that the agent has proposed an output but has not approved it.
The reviewer evaluates the evidence, records feedback, and only then marks the work complete.
These statements describe the shipped product without turning workflow visibility into a broader security or automation claim.
Raltic exposes workflow review state; it does not automatically enforce authorization in every external system.
A human review step improves control only when the reviewer has the context, authority, and time to evaluate the output.
High-impact actions should use the destination system's own permissions and approval controls in addition to the Raltic record.
FAQ